Although the main character of Life of Pi may seem
irrational, I think his irrational ways are understandable considering the
traumatic events that occurred. No one but the author knows which story is
real, but both stories are tragic either way. Pi, mathematically speaking, is
an irrational number. I think the choosing of Pi’s name was absolutely
intentional, meaning even the author perceives Pi as irrational. The
significance of Pi’s madness is that even though his way of thinking seems
irrational to us readers, everything makes sense to him and that’s what
matters.
Pi has three different religions. Completely
irrational. But even though he has all
these religions, he has reasons as to why he does. Irrational means the same as
unreasonable. Pi’s religion isn’t unreasonable because it makes sense to him.
Religion is personal and everyone has different views and beliefs. Religion is
all about what the INDIVIDUAL believes in.
Just because Pi’s beliefs are different doesn’t make them unreasonable.
He believes in God and has respect for people who at least believe in
something/someone even if they’re beliefs are different. Religion, just like
the truth, is open to interpretation. Pi understands that other people have
different beliefs and justifies his way of thinking when he explains that he
doesn’t respect people who have no religion. He talks about how everyone should
at least believe in some kind of God. This shows he at least has some reason
behind his beliefs. He chooses to believe in God because he feels not having a
religion is wrong and the combination makes sense to him.
I believe Pi’s “lying” about his story is absolutely justifiable.
Regardless of which story is true, he made up the other version to cope with
the real one; as explained by the author in an interview. Just like much of
society, Pi sugar coated his story to make it easier to accept. We downplay and
twist things around all the time to make them easier to cope with. When
something big happens at my house, we usually tell my younger brother a less
intense version of the story or a version that won’t have as much of an effect
on him. I don’t find this irrational at all because it doesn’t change what happened
and it helps from causing more pain with the situation. I think this easily
relates to Pi in the way that, if he changed the story to animals instead of
people it made him a little more detached emotionally from the chaos. The
actions of the characters would also be easier to accept because animals are
supposed to act savagely, while it is not acceptable in society for a person to
act like the characters in Pi’s stories did. I think Pi was just trying to
loosen the emotional attachment to the story to ease his mind. Mainly because instead
of having his mother killed, he would have an animal killed in the story.
Although Pi loved animals and had plenty of respect for them, a family member
would have more of an emotional attachment for him. Pi changing the story doesn’t
change what really happened and doesn’t harm anyone. If anything it helps him
overcome and accept his traumatic experience. Pi’s lying may be irrational but
in his instance I think it is totally justifiable due to the severity of his
experience. The officers would still get the information they needed about the
ship sinking. The changing of the stories affects no one but Pi, so if he wants
to make it easier to process and live with, I think that’s justifiable.